05 August 2009
Advice from an Italian mother
03 August 2009
Bad Travellin', Part II
My trip to Porto Fino was on the other side of ‘get up and go’ coin. The town is about an hour’s boat ride north of Sestri and the boat trip is supposed to include a 45-minute stop at the town on the other side of peninsula from Porto Fino, called San Fruttuoso. San Fruttuoso is home to “Il Cristo degli Abissi” or “The Christ of the Abyss.” The story is that over a century ago a boat that was trying to dock in San Fruttuoso’s small bay crashed and sank. The statue of Jesus was part of the cargo, but instead of fishing it out of the bay, the residents left it as it was.* It’s not possible to see the statue from the boat, but it apparently can be easily seen if you swim out and dive down a little. There is a festival every year celebrating “Il Cristo degli Abissi” the last Sunday of every July. Alas, I could not attend.
Turns out I should have taken a clue from the fate of the ship in the story. I didn’t find this out until later, but if the sea is anything but completely calm, the boat won’t make the stop in San Fruttuoso. All we did was go around the peninsula and look at the bay from the boat. I also got to hear the captain announce, “San Fruttuoso: il interno degli Cristo degli Abissi.” Thanks. Because I wasn’t aware of that when I bought the ticket.
My hopes to see a crazy Jesus statue dashed, I was excited to get more than the allotted hour’s time to walk around Porto Fino. “It’s beautiful,” my employers told me, “You could look at the yachts all day if you wanted.” Porto Fino is where the ultra-rich go to vacation. And not just rich Italians. Everything there was translated into German, French and English as well as Italian (I was told George Clooney has a house and a yacht there? I don’t know if this is true). So at the very least I figured I was in for some pretty architecture and good views. The rich have to want those things right?
There’s a scene in Pride and Prejudice in which Lizzy is traveling with her aunt and uncle and they want to go to Pemberly to which Lizzy objects. In reality, she wishes to avoid Pemberly because she wishes to avoid Mr. Darcy, but as she cannot explain the situation to her relatives, her stated reason for disliking Mr. Darcy (and therefore his estate) is because “he’s so . . . rich.” I am Lizzy Bennett without the loved-but-rejected suitor behind my words. I should have known Porto Fino would annoy me. The first yacht I saw looked as if it could have crossed the Atlantic unscathed and its owner had christened it Limitless. Oh, I thought, so he thinks he’s God. There was also the more crude option, but I’ll leave that in case any of my readers are naïve enough not to think of it.
It didn’t get much better once we got to port. I had an hour and a half to explore, but it was far too long. You see, as a traveling philosopher-nanny, I’m quite poor. I like to go places to see what else there is in this world, not to buy things. There was really nothing but the latter option in Porto Fino. Lots and lots of shops where I could drop a month’s rent without batting an eye. No, I’d prefer to have a roof over my head for thirty days rather than have this nice shirt. Thanks for the option though.
But, as this is OVRP, I should be able to at least write about the town’s church, correct? I mean, this is why I’m generally drawn to churches – unless it’s a huge cathedral, entrance is free, and it’s where most of the best art (at least in Italy) is anyway. One of the only perks about getting off Sundays, on which most things in Italy are closed, is that the churches are open all day long. It seems, however, the ultra-rich don’t care much for mass. There was only one parish (which for Italy is insignificant), and the church was not open. I noticed there was only one mass per Sunday.
My last resort was to get some gelato. I paid €4 for a small cone, which is a bit outrageous. It wasn’t even good.
Lest you think I’m complaining about my terrible life in Italy where I get to ride boats to mountains and stay on the beach, I’ll just say that compared to the week before (and the weeks after) the Porto Fino trip was a bust. The bad traveler got her comeuppance.
*This story is false. It's just what the residents like to say what happened. They actually put the statue there themselves in 1954. Not as fun though, right?
28 July 2009
No Voglio
There is a kiddie-ride here in Sestri that I think is the bane of most parents’ existence; it is called il Bruco Gnam. If that means something, I don’t know the translation, but the ride is familiar to anyone who has been to carnivals – it’s a child version of a roller coaster, with only three little hills and usually the cars are decorated to be some kind of animal; I’ve seen dragons most of the time, but here it’s a caterpillar. Very route, but the kids here go crazy for the ride because of an addition I’d never seen before – there is a small lion with a detachable tail hanging above them that this guy who runs the ride pulls up and down while the kids try and get it. It’s rigged—he tries to be very democratic about which child wins—but if the children know it, they don’t care because their main goal in life at that point is to catch the coda and win a free ride.
It’s not the ride that interests me so much, but the guy who runs it. This isn’t like a carnival where employees hired by the bigger company run the ride – no, I’m almost positive this guy, who my employers lovingly call Signor Bruco, owns the ride and this is his living.
Signor Bruco looks to be in his mid-fifties and he sits in the small controller box all day long chain-smoking, with sunglasses on no matter what time of day it is. He is the man who controls the fate of the children and whether or not they will be able to win this time around. As I stated above, Signor Bruco is very fair so no complaints there, but while he’s pulling the rope that controls the lion, he always adds comments. The comments themselves are relatively harmless, “occhio” (look), “prendilo” (grab it), “sedute” (sit down, for all those children about to kill themselves trying to get the coda), are his favorites. It’s just the way Signor Bruco says these things that weirds me out a bit. You’d think the delivery would be along the same lines of carnival workers—like the really annoying moms at U8 soccer games—but no, Signor Bruco’s diction is like that of Barry White. I doubt he has much control over his deep voice, but “occhio” doesn’t have to be pronounced as if he’s about to sex up his girlfriend. Prendilo is the worst of the bunch, not only because he draws it out the longest (PRENdiiiilooooooo), but because I know what he’s saying.
Perhaps I am just over-sensitive, or my American prudishness is coming out. That may be, but I have more reasons to be strangely fascinated by Signor Bruco, and that is the music that is playing at his ride. Rather, the diversity of music. One of the first times I noticed the music at the ride, the album Slow Train Coming by Bob Dylan was blazing out of the speakers. Delighted as I was, I couldn’t help thinking huh, strange choice for a kiddie ride. Still, I shrugged it off and figured that if I was stuck doing this all day every day, I would play whatever I wanted too.
And play whatever he wants he does. I now wish I had been keeping a more thorough list along the way, but the strangest ones have stuck with me. I have heard techno, Snoop D-O-double G, Maroon 5, some jazz that I’m pretty sure was Miles Davis, and, I shit you not, KC and the Sunshine Band’s Greatest Hits.
I can only formulate questions. What? How does one person like all of these genres enough to listen to them for entire days? And how does a middle-aged Italian man even know of Snoop Dogg, let alone play the music at a kiddie-ride?
I’m afraid my question will go unanswered. I’m too nervous to strike up a conversation, for fear of him saying to me, “PRENdiloooooo”.
22 July 2009
Bad Travellin', Part I
20 July 2009
I knew something was wrong when he asked "Susie, how does it flush?"
17 July 2009
Bear with me on this one
One step up the metaphysical chain we have animals, which in addition to needing things, also want. "Animals might overeat because they enjoy eating, but plants do not overindulge . . . they have no motivation to do so."
Then there are human beings, who have a trait besides needing and wanting. Sokolowski states,
Of course like plants and animals, human beings do need some things--food, shelter, company, assistance--and like animals they also consciously want some things, but their wanting can give rise to new forms of desire. Besides needing and wanting, human beings can wish for certain things. Wanting is conscious desire, but wishing is intelligent desire.
Sokolowski distinguishes between wishing and wanting through the category of distance; "if we could achieve [the wished for action] immediately," he asserts, " we would not wish for it, we would just do it." Deliberation, then, is the material of a wish. Sokolowski clarifies with an example: "if my ear itches, I raise my hand and scratch it. There is no distinction between means and purposes in this performance." In contrast, a full-scale wish--for example, the wish to get in shape--requires the deliberation and then insertion of something between the purpose and myself--to continue the example, lifting weights, running, etc.
As I was reading, although agreeing for the most part, I found myself raising a few objections. First of all, Sokolowski asserts that there is nothing analogous to needs, wants and wishes in nonliving matter; "atoms and molecules as such do not try and maintain their identities", and again, "when an atom emits a particle, nothing has really been lost. Nonliving things are indifferent to such changes."
Perhaps my countless lab hours in undergrad have caused me to anthropomorphize atoms, molecules and compounds, but I don't think I fully agree with this. Atoms tend toward lowest energy states; it's how molecules and ions--and thus most structures of complexity--are formed. And when an atom emits a particle, something is definitively lost, that is, energy. As this chapter is located in the section of the book entitled "The Body and Human Action", the first chapter of which is dedicated to explaining how the different types of energy in the world impress upon us and cause us to percieve, react, and concept, I have to believe that the emitting of a particle is pretty big deal for all parties involved. In any case, I have to think more about this (and probably consult a chemist and/or physicist).
My other objection is more vague; less an argument against than a feeling of discomfort with the idea. I very much liked the first statement Sokolowski makes about us, that is, "human beings go beyond both needing and wanting" (emphasis mine), but then he seems to backtrack a bit on this when he draws out the distinction between a want and a wish in humans. The categories of needing, wanting and wishing seem to fit nicely with Thomas Aquinas' explanation of different souls: the vegetative, the sensitive, and the rational. But the sensitive soul is not merely the vegetative soul + 1, and more to the point, that rational soul is not the vegetative soul + the sensitive soul + 1. Rather, each higher step takes up the previous and forms something wholly new--albeit with the powers of the former type. It seems to me the activity of wishing would take up within it and transform needing and wanting, because humans do not need and want the same way plants and animals do. Do we not always do something freely because we wish it? Where does a sensory-act in response to a want end and a logical-deliberation-act in reponse to a wish begin? Ultimately, I suspect Sokolowski is right, and that I need to go back, reread and reflect, but right now, it's not clear.
Yesterday, though, as I was feeding infant Samuel, my ear started to itch. With one hand supporting the infant and the other holding his needed source of nourishment, my inner response was only this: I really fucking wish I could scratch my ear.
And just in case you're interested:
Phenomenology of the Human Person, Robert Sokolowski. Cambridge University Press, (New York, 2008).
15 July 2009
On Italian Men
I replied that I rather did not enjoy being cat-called while walking down the street, no matter in what country.
My esteemed professor then told me that Italian men compliment women differently than American men; Italian men are complimenting beauty while not being sexual, and I could not appreciate it because (and with this, I whole-heartedly agree) "All Americans are prudes."
However, concerning her main point:
I remain unconvinced.
13 July 2009
In Between
The Basel SBB train, being Swiss, was orderly, quiet, clean and early to most stops. Our route was through the Alps and I could not have asked better scenery. Small Swiss towns dotted the sides of the moutains and I could occaisionally see little blonde children playing in the fields. It was right out of a story book. My eyes were led from snows covered caps to the green sides of the mountains by steeps rivers rushing downwards. Absolutely breathtaking.
I scheduled myself a four hour layover in Milan so when I arrived at Stazione Centrale I hurried off the train to look for the metro. With a whopping six lines, Milan's metro is 3x the size of Rome's. I searched for the yellow line, went four stops west and emerged from underground to one of the most awesome sights in my travels: Milan's Duomo.
The front of the Duomo has recently been cleaned, so its white sand stone contrasts starkly with the brown tones of the buildings surrounding its massive square. It's topped by a gold statue of Mary, which at the time was shining brilliantly under the incredibly hot sun. The buildiong's copper doors are now oxidized darkened green, but at common points where people touch you can see thge metallic sheen. And the doors, oh what doors! Four sets of double doors lead into the church, each set depicting different sections of Chrstian history: the Old Testament, the Gospels, the rest of the New Testament and one is dedicated to the martyrs. I could have stood for hours just looking at those doors.
As I only had about three hours though, I entered the Church. The juxtaposition of the stark white exteriors with the very dark interior blinds you while your eyes adjust, but once they do they dart around because there is so much to take in. I find I always have to control myself in churches like this one - I have to reign in the urge to say "ooh, that looks interesting and7or beautiful, I'll run over and look at that!" I attacked St. Peter's in Rome this way the first time I entered and wound up darting back and forth between chapels and not really taking anything in. So I was very methodical at the Duomo, going down the left, circling around the altar and coming back up the right aisle.
The whole route took me most of my three hours, and the greater part of that time was spent looking at the three great stained glass window collages at the back of the church. As far as I could tell, the first set tells the story of the Torah pictorially, the second the story of Jesus' life, death and resurrection, and the third depicts the lives of assorted saints. Each set must have been made up of at least one hundrer 2' x 2' windows. I cannot imagine how much labor was invested in the endeavor.
When I exited the Duomo I decided to get a gelatro and study the doors once more with my remaining fifteen minutes. As I was standing there, cone in hand, I unbelievably saw a familiar face - one of my classmates from back in the States. He was stopping off in Milan for two hours and we both happned to be in the right place at the right time. We said hi, marveled at our meeting, and then I had to reented the metro to make my way back to Centrale.
Centrale is a bit frenetic and very dirty, but it has beautiful architecture and serves its purpose, so one can't complain. As I was staring at the ticker board, I saw a train to Rome that left five minutes after mine and for a good 10 seconds I seriously considered boarding that one and letting my employers keep the luggage they were transporting for me. But I thought better of it and with unquenched nostalgia I boarded my two and half hour train to Sestri.
The Trenitalia train, being Italian, was hectic, dirty, crowded, and late to almost every station. I found out I didn't have seat, so I popped a squat on some steps and hung out near a bathroom for most of the trip. It was actually more comfortable than a tiny train seat and my position privvied me to all sorts of characters boarding, exiting and travelling throuh the train cars, including one fellow who locked himself in the bathroom in an attempt to ride for free. His plan was thwarted after one passenger tried to use the toilet three times and finally notified one of the conductors. The carabinieri were then summoned and the would-be free-rider was kicked off the train at the next stop.
The rest of the ride was relatively unevenful and I claimed a spot on the sea-side of the train after we reached Genova. I was content to stand and look at the Adriatic for the hour that remained until I reached Sestri.
10 July 2009
Danielus Arianicus: A Play in Three Acts
Back in Basel upon first meeting shy David, one of the first things I suggested to him was that we play with the baskets full of legos in the boys' playroom. As a nanny, I love legos, especially for little boys. The male sex seems to take special pleasure in entropy at work and this inclination for destruction begins well before the age of reason. Luckily at this point in their development any harm done is a on a very small scale and there is no love lost. Legos are perfect for this purpose. I cannot express how manty hours I spent in Basel building towers of blocks only to watch Daniel and David knock them down with glee. And because of this, whenever I arrived at his flat, David usual greeting was not "Ciao!" but, "Play Lego?"
In a terrible oversight, I failed to make sure some legos were brought with us to Sestri. David's ever-present question to me had to be answered each time with "I'm sorry David, but we don't have any legos here." His facial expression reminded me of those times when my family vacationed at the shore when my father prevented my younger brother from destroying the sandcastles I had just spent hours laboring over - that is, utter dissapointment. Except this time, I feel badly.
Act 2
Wednesday however, was David's birthday, It was a joyous occaision and both sets of his grandparents celebrated with us (which made for another extrememly interesting linguistic experience as neither set of grandparents knows English, the parents' common language). David recieved a book from me, shoes from his Italian grandparents, a puzzle from his parents, and ecco! a set of legos--enough to build a small train, conductor included--from his German grandparents. He held the box high above his head and yelled "Susie! Susie! Play lego!" It was a triumphant moment for the young boy.
Later that day, after repasso, David wanted to 'play lego'. I of course obliged, but was also preoccupied watching Daniel the Arian destroyer. Fulfilling his duties as a younger brother, Daniel only wanted to play with David's new legos and not any of the plethora of other toys I placed in front of him. David finally decided to placate the "pest" (his word, not mine) by giving him the conductor to the train. None of us could scarcely guess his fate.
Daniel, finally appeased, was playing quietly within my eyesight so I turned my attention to David - it was his birthday after all. While I was figuring out which side of the lego train car to place the lego whistle on to make the model look exactly the same as its counterpart pictured on the packaging, I heard a distinctive crack. I looked at Daniel: his lips were pursed together and he had the distinctive look of risibility on his face that only comes with a naughty act (incidentally, the Italians have a word for this that I like very much: furbo. It translates as 'clever', and has devilish undertones, but its connotation remains positive). I began to look around for what the young child had broken.
And then, I saw him.
The headless body of lego-man-train-conductor gripped by Daniel's right hand.
Nanny instincts kicked in and I quickly removed the aforementioned's head from the mouth of the young Arian. David, understandably so, was not happy. "Don't worry, I can fix this," I assured him and retrieved superglue from one of the kitchen drawers. After a small operation and a minute of recovery time lego-man-train-conductor was revived and peace remained between the two brothers.
Act 3
Thursday morning I awoke and found David playing with his legos, in which he genially invited me to participate. To his credit, he had again given his brother lego-man-train-conductor; perhaps all had been forgiven or forgotten. In any case, all was well as I began to make myself some coffee.
It was a beautiful day and as such the boys' mother had the doors that lead out to the small balcony of our second storey flat wide open. The balcony has a grate around it with spaces between the bars large enough to allow my hand through, but not anything larger. The boys like to go out and watch the sea so when Daniel wandered out I thought nothing of it.
I really should learn from my mistakes.
Just as the caffeine was kicking in and the fog lifting from my mind, I hear Daniel yelling and pointing at something on the street below. I crossed the room to the balcony, looked below and just barely saw a little piece of yellow plastic with a face on it. I squinted and saw that the yellow plastic face also has an orange conductor's hat. Then I saw a red torso with one arm attached . . . and then another arm . . . and then black plastic legs. Lego-man-train-conductor had been quartered. His crime, the same as mine--trusting an 18th month old Arian--but his punishment, well beyond what I will have to pay.
The worst of my transgressions though remained yet to come. I did not collect what left of lego-man-train-conductor as I saw the street cleaning crew approaching. He had a nameless mass burial with countless other fallen toys.
Last of all, I have not informed David of his loss. He remains, to my knowledge, blissfully unaware. I shall keep Daniel's secret forever with me and now pass it on to you.
09 July 2009
Coming and Going
I now reside in Sestri Levante, Italy (decidedly not post-Christian), a small beach city on the northwest coast of the good ol' boot, where the internet is an endangered species and no one but me speaks English. This will be my home for the next 5 weeks and I can't say I'm unhappy about it.
Sestri is a small mushroom shaped peninsula and as such is known as 'La città de due mare' or 'the city of two seas'. Because of its shape, there are two bays on either side and at some points the land is narrow enough that you can turn your head right and look at one and turn your head left and look at the other without ever moving your feet. The northwest Italian coast is also dotted with mountains so when I leave the beach my vista is the low green mountains of the Alps. Not a bad way to live.
There's not too much to the city - sort of your typical slow and layed-back beach town. I have found a couple of places I really enjoy already though; one is called 'Baia del Silenzio' or 'Bay of Silence', but I think it sounds much nicer in Italian. It's the smaller less populated bay and you can hike up to a point on the mainland where you can see the peninsula of Sestri and across it to the other bay. No one goes up there because it's quite a steep climb, but the view is worth it. I stay up up there and read when I get a chance to go in the daytime or just take in the moon's reflection on the Adriatic if I go up after the sun has set. Not exactly the best way to practice my Italian, but now that I'm living with the Levis, a silent moment is difficult to find.
And speaking of the Levis, next time I will write the tail of Daniel and the lego man. It qualifies as a Shakesperian tragedy.
07 July 2009
Out of the Office
I'm in Sestri Levante Italy where there is no such thing as WiFi and only two internet points exist in the entire town. Because Italians understand what lesiure is, the internet points are closed from 12-3:30, which is most of the time I have off. They also close at 7:30.
I think what I'm going to start doing is writing free hand and coming here and transcribing some updates, but as I have not yet done this - no updates for now. Soon though.
02 July 2009
These are my friends
I love hearing about your young ward, although I'm afraid that, as a red-blooded American, I cannot support his existence. Three languages in as many years? The Germans' breeding of highly intelligent children cannot go unchecked; otherwise, America might actually have to start investing money in education, and I AIN'T HAVING IT. It is your patriotic duty as an American to level the playing field.Smother the children, Derkins. Democracy demands it.Do your country proud. If the parents complain, simply give them a German Shepard puppy or two. They should be in abundance over there, and just as bloodthirsty as German children.
01 July 2009
Watch out the world's behind you
28 June 2009
The three year old philological experiment
24 June 2009
Sheep and Goats
22 June 2009
The Strange Allure of Pink
20 June 2009
Feierbendkonzerte
19 June 2009
A Confession
Daniel is the 18 month old I take care of most of the day. He has the blondest hair and the bluest eyes I've ever seen; his mother is a Greek/Italian, so obviously those Arian genes he inherited from his father really are dominant. Daniel, like (I hope) most other children his age is interminably curious and always wants what he cannot/should not have. Perhaps I should not think something so devious of someone so young, but I believe he feigns injury so that I will pick him up and he can then get his fair little hands on things at adult eye-level. Complicating this matter is the fact that the apartment Daniel and his family lives in is not baby-proofed, which leads to my following him around and taking from him the things which could inevitably lead to injury and possible death. In the past two weeks this has included but is not limited to pens, magnets, coins, a hairdryer, utensils of all shapes and sizes, and those really heavy fake Chinese relaxation balls with chimes in them. Daniel's parents think this is funny and cute. Daniel's parents are not his primary caregivers.
One day last week Daniel started taking books off the lower level shelves in the family room. Finally! I thought, something that won't kill him. I let him take the books off the shelves and flip through the pages. He seemed fairly interested, so I figured I had a good ten minutes before he got bored and waddled into the next room. After about forty-five seconds, however, Daniel's grandfather and namesake walked into the room, said to Daniel "Nein! No! No librettos per Daniel." He then looked at me and said "He destroy books."
I was a bit taken aback, given that the grandfather sits around all day and reads novels (we had a halting conversation in Italio-English about A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court the other day) while his wife and I chase the little ones around -- surely he wants to instill a love of books in his grandchild? What better way to kill this nascent curiosity than to disallow any encounters with the material of a book itself? It's half the fun, I dare say. The musty smell and worn-in spines of old books, the crisp, stuck-together pages of new books that have a spine so straight it seems like they are resistant to letting you read them. These are experiences a child Daniel's age can appreciate, even if the letters on the page mean nothing!
So, I must admit, I have been letting Daniel take books off the shelves and play with them - under my watchful eye of course. If he even looks like he is about to tear a cover, crinkle a page, or place the spine in his mouth (the tool of choice for curious toddlers), the book gets taken away, along with an explanation of why. For with a love of books and their form, I want to also instill respect. Daniel and I had a breakthrough the other day with a small English-Italian dictionary when he got it out, thumbed through the pages, and then placed it back on the shelf exactly as it had been. "Bravo Daniel!" I cried and clapped my hands. He smiled. I thought I had gotten through to him.
This, however, is not my confession.
Back at the end of May when I was haphazardly packing all of my belongings to move to a house a mere seven spaces down on the same street, I almost forgot that a friend and former roommate has asked me to be temporally responsible for one box of books belonging to her. Around 11:00 pm of the night before I was to leave the city, I remembered the forgotten books in the basement, ran down, and began placing the books in one of the empty boxes of another roommate who has not yet begun her arduous process of packing. This operation should have taken five minutes tops, but with a toddler-like curiosity I examined each of the thirty or so books before putting them away. Most of the books I had heard of, many I had read or at least read parts of, but one entitled Life in Macondo I never knew had even been written. As the last new novel I read had been 100 Years of Solitude, on the recommendation of the roommate who owned the books, I was quite interested. I tossed Life in Macondo in my own bag, finished packing up the rest of the books, figured my roommate would be nonethewiser, and I could tell her after I finished it that it was a handling fee.
Daniel Levi had not yet entered my life.
Yesterday, as Daniel was playing with books on his parents' bookshelves, I walked out of the room to check on his lunch. At sixty seconds, I was obviously out of the room for far too long and got suddenly nervous when I didn't hear the child. I ran back into the room only to discover that Daniel had taken my purse down from a high shelf and gotten the book I am currently reading out of my purse, that is, Life in Macondo. A half second of triumph (out of all the things in my purse, he chose the book!) was followed by horror as I realized he had torn the dilapidated cover clear off the collection of short stories. I could no longer tell my roommate, who shares my love of books, that borrowing her book was a handling fee. Life in Macondo has been sacrificed to the gods of curiosity at the hands of an 18-month-old Arian. Would Márquez approve?